Currently, the use of Next Generation Sequencing (NGS) for total genomic sequencing (Whole Genome Sequencing, WGS), total exome sequencing (Whole Exome Sequencing, WES), or total RNA sequencing is considered as extensive mapping. This also applies to the aforementioned methods used on DNA/RNA from human tumors, as the results often reveal the genetic profile of the rest of the body.
However, gene sequencing of bacteria isolated from humans is not considered extensive mapping of an individual's genome.
Targeted sequencing, where the sequencing is directed at a limited number of defined genes, is also not covered by the term "extensive mapping of an individual's genome". This also applies to Genome Wide Association Studies (GWAS), performed using SNP-arrays, which examine common gene variants. GWAS that also map rare variants, which can have high predictive value and thus significant importance for the trial subjects, are considered extensive mapping (for example, Infinium Global Screening Array from Illumina).
Epigenetic studies are considered extensive mapping of an individual's genome if they can generate incidental findings of significant importance for the trial subject being examined. Analyses that do not provide extensive sequence information are not covered. This includes, for example, the use of methylation assays (which examine a limited part of CpG sites in the human genome). However, methods that involve DNA sequencing by NGS of a large number of areas in the genome are considered to be extensive mapping (for example, whole genome bisulfite sequencing, which can provide information on all CpG sites).
Even if extensive sequencing is not carried out, the committee system recommends following the principles in the genome guidance if there is a risk of making unexpected findings (for example, in targeted investigation of a very large number of genes).